Abstract

There are many approaches to maintaining wellness, including taking a simple vacation to attending highly structured wellness retreats, which typically regulate the attendee's personal time and activities. In a healthy English-speaking cohort of 112 women and men (aged 30–80 years), this study examined the effects of participating in either a 6-days intensive wellness retreat based on Ayurvedic medicine principles or unstructured 6-days vacation at the same wellness center setting. Heart rate variability (HRV) was monitored continuously using a wearable ECG sensor patch for up to 7 days prior to, during, and 1-month following participation in the interventions. Additionally, salivary cortisol levels were assessed for all participants at multiple times during the day. Continual HRV monitoring data in the real-world setting was seen to be associated with demographic [HRVALF: βAge = 0.98 (95% CI = 0.96–0.98), false discovery rate (FDR) < 0.001] and physiological characteristics [HRVPLF: β = 0.98 (95% CI = 0.98–1), FDR =0.005] of participants. HRV features were also able to quantify known diurnal variations [HRVLF/HF: βACT:night vs. early−morning = 2.69 (SE = 1.26), FDR < 0.001] along with notable inter- and intraperson heterogeneity in response to intervention. A statistically significant increase in HRVALF [β = 1.48 (SE = 1.1), FDR < 0.001] was observed for all participants during the resort visit. Personalized HRV analysis at an individual level showed a distinct individualized response to intervention, further supporting the utility of using continuous real-world tracking of HRV at an individual level to objectively measure responses to potentially stressful or relaxing settings.

Highlights

  • Stress, in varying degrees and of varying durations, impacts every single human and has a major influence on their health [1]

  • We further explored if changes in Heart rate variability (HRV) sustained over a period of time by remotely monitoring participants 1 month after the interventions

  • No significant difference in baseline demographic characteristics was seen between the participants in PH and RELAX cohorts including the subset of participants that were non-randomly assigned to PH intervention (Supplementary Table 1)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In varying degrees and of varying durations, impacts every single human and has a major influence on their health [1]. Healthy individuals typically can manage short, acute episodes of routine stress without health consequences. If stress becomes persistent, the long-term effects can significantly impair mental and physiological well-being [2]. Chronic stress is often insidious and develops slowly, making it difficult for an individual experiencing it to recognize it [4]. The marked variability in stress responses among individuals can make it difficult to be clearly recognized by others, including family and even mental health professionals [5]. There is a critical need for objective, reproducible measures of an individual’s ability to recover from stress

Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call