Abstract
The aim of this study was to compare the immediate effect, on active mouth opening, following a single treatment of latent myofascial trigger points (MTrPs) in the masseter muscle involving a muscle energy technique, i.e. post-isometric relaxation, and the strain/counterstrain technique. Ninety subjects, 42 men and 48 women, aged 19–44 years old, participated in this study. Subjects underwent a screening process to establish the presence of MTrPs in the masseter muscle as described by Simons et al. Subjects were divided randomly into three groups: group A which was treated with a post-isometric relaxation technique, group B treated with the strain/counterstrain technique, and group C as control group. The outcome measure was the maximum active mouth opening. It was assessed pre-treatment and 5min post-treatment by an assessor blinded to the treatment allocation of the subject. Within-group changes showed a significant improvement in active mouth opening following application of the post-isometric relaxation technique ( P < 0.001 ), but not following application of strain/counterstrain ( P = 0.08 ). The control group did not show any change ( P < 0.1 ). Pre–post-effect sizes were large in the post-isometric relaxation group ( d = 1.46 ), small to medium in the strain/counterstrain group ( d = 0.32 ) and small in the control group ( d = 0.01 ). Differences were found between the post-isometric relaxation group and both the strain/counterstrain and control groups ( P < 0.001 ), but not between these two latter groups ( P = 0.8 ). Our results suggest that the post-isometric relaxation technique might be employed in the management of latent MTrPs in the masseter muscle in order to improve the maximum mouth opening.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have