Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the immediate effect, on active mouth opening, following a single treatment of latent myofascial trigger points (MTrPs) in the masseter muscle involving a muscle energy technique, i.e. post-isometric relaxation, and the strain/counterstrain technique. Ninety subjects, 42 men and 48 women, aged 19–44 years old, participated in this study. Subjects underwent a screening process to establish the presence of MTrPs in the masseter muscle as described by Simons et al. Subjects were divided randomly into three groups: group A which was treated with a post-isometric relaxation technique, group B treated with the strain/counterstrain technique, and group C as control group. The outcome measure was the maximum active mouth opening. It was assessed pre-treatment and 5min post-treatment by an assessor blinded to the treatment allocation of the subject. Within-group changes showed a significant improvement in active mouth opening following application of the post-isometric relaxation technique ( P < 0.001 ), but not following application of strain/counterstrain ( P = 0.08 ). The control group did not show any change ( P < 0.1 ). Pre–post-effect sizes were large in the post-isometric relaxation group ( d = 1.46 ), small to medium in the strain/counterstrain group ( d = 0.32 ) and small in the control group ( d = 0.01 ). Differences were found between the post-isometric relaxation group and both the strain/counterstrain and control groups ( P < 0.001 ), but not between these two latter groups ( P = 0.8 ). Our results suggest that the post-isometric relaxation technique might be employed in the management of latent MTrPs in the masseter muscle in order to improve the maximum mouth opening.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call