Abstract

ObjectivesTo examine the changes caused by fluorescein in the tear film by analyzing the qualitative parameters such as breakup location and also detailed quantitative parameters. Methods: After determining the break-up time (BUT) value and breakup locations by the Non-invasive break-up time (NI-BUT) method, we re-evaluated the changes in the tear film stained with fluorescein using the topographical method. We called the topographic evaluation of the tear film stained with fluorescein as the Hybrid-BUT test. The results for the parameters obtained for each participant by the NI-BUT and Hybrid-BUT tests were compared. ResultsOur study was conducted with 82 participants aged between 18 and 58 years (mean age 34.1 ± 11.1). The mean first break-up time value (BUT1) was 4.1 ± 2.7 s on the NI-BUT test versus 5.1 ± 3.2 s on the Hybrid-BUT test (p = 0.029). The mean average of all break-up time values (BUTAvg) for each participant was 7.2 ± 3.2 s on the NI-BUT test versus 8.4 ± 3.1 s on the Hybrid-BUT test (p = 0.004). After dividing the corneal surface into quadrants of 90°, there was no significant difference in the comparison of the locations of the first breakup (QUAD(First breakup)), the second breakup (QUAD(2nd breakup)) and the third breakup (QUAD(3rd breakup)) between the two tests (p>0.05). ConclusionsFluorescein affects quantitative values rather than qualitative parameters in tear film. We observed that the change caused by fluorescein in tear film break-up time could be detected objectively and in a documented manner using Hybrid-BUT test.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call