Abstract

Since the 1960s, shamanism has become one of the landmarks for a new way of life and a more respectful relationship of humans with nature in the Western world. Both researchers and practitioners regard the foundation of shamanism as being animism – an understanding of the connection of all living beings. The role of the community is highlighted in shamanism as the shaman is expected to work for his community. Shamanistic techniques vary according to the society or place where it is practised. In the study of neo-shamanism in the post-modern world, autoethnographic research has been seen as necessary, especially in order to explore the experience of the shaman. In this article we ask what has changed in the perceptions of the community in the study of shamanism and how this change has influenced the position of the researcher. Our article reflects on the resolution of the diversity and sameness through autoethnography, where the researcher is located not only in the experience, but also in its interpretation – which highlights great challenges in contextualizing the study, in writing on the concepts concerned, and indeed in the entire research process.

Highlights

  • Shamanism as a phenomenon has drawn researchers’ attention since the nineteenth century

  • To get a grip on this, we have reviewed how the position and methods of the researcher have changed in the study of shamanism over the years

  • When looking into the historic­al developments within the study of shamanism, it is possible to see a shift in the perspectives

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Shamanism as a phenomenon has drawn researchers’ attention since the nineteenth century. We briefly examine the research of so-called traditional shaman­ism by taking our examples from the Finnish history of researching shamanism After this do we move on to look at the context of contemporary shamanism in more detail. As the shamanic­practitioner and teacher Jonathan Horwitz from the Scandinavian Center for Shamanic Studies (SCSS) says in an interview (Kelly 2017: 98), shamani­c knowledge can only be acquired through individual experience, which is ‘different from a dogma or a belief system’. He explains that ‘this is because shamani­sm is not a matter of belief, it is a matter of experi­ence’ and ‘a spiritual path’. The authors’ autoethnog­raphic data are included in the research material through research notes and diaries

Animism and shamanism
From studying traditional shamanism to researching contemporary shamanism
Discussion
Literature
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.