Abstract

In flammable shrublands fire size often depends on local management. Policy and land use change can drastically alter fire regimes, affecting livelihoods, biodiversity, and carbon storage. In Ethiopia, burning of vegetation is banned, but the burn ban is more strongly enforced inside the Bale Mountains National Park. We investigated if and how policy and land use change have affected fire regimes inside/outside the park. The park was established in 1969, and both studied areas have been part of a new REDD+ project since 2013. Our hypothesis is that burnt heathland stands are nonflammable and act as fuel breaks, and hence that reduced ignition rates leads to larger fires. To quantify change we analyzed remote-sensed imagery from 10 fire-seasons between 1968 and 2017, quantifying sizes of resprouting Erica stands and recording their postfire age. To elucidate underlying mechanisms of change we interviewed 41 local smallholders. There was a five order of magnitude variation in patch size ( 1000 ha). A significant interaction was found between year and site (inside/outside park) in explaining patch size, indicating that the park establishment has affected fire size. Inside the park there was a tendency of patch size increase and outside a clear decrease. Especially the largest fires (> 100 ha) increased in numbers inside the park but not outside. Respondents confirmed that large fires have increased in frequency and attributed this mainly to lack of fuel breaks and the fact that fires today are ignited in a more uncontrolled manner later in the dry season. Outside the park respondents explained that fires have become smaller because of increased ignition and intensified grazing. Both situations degrade pasture and threaten Erica shrub survival. For flammable ecosystems, REDD+ fire-exclusion policies need updating, and in this case complemented with a community-based fire management program making use of the vivid local traditional fire knowledge.

Highlights

  • Natural and anthropogenic fire regimes Around the world flammable shrublands have traditionally been managed by fire to reduce canopy cover, increase forage production, and to get rid of predators and pests (Keeley et al 2012)

  • Our interview results clarify the underlying mechanisms behind these trends: (1) burning is essential for local livelihoods and cannot be excluded from this highly flammable vegetation, (2) the more strongly enforced burn ban inside the national park has reduced ignition rates and the number of young stands acting as fuel-breaks, resulting in larger fires, (3) the burn ban has shifted ignitions to later in the dry season, (4) outside the park increased ignition, caused by intensified land use, has decreased fire sizes, and (5) extended droughts have been frequent lately, but large fires occurred mainly inside the park (Fig. 8)

  • IMPLICATIONS The main aim of this study was to increase our understanding of how changes in policy and land use has altered the fire regimes, and how this has implications for the new REDD+ project, and potentially for other REDD+ projects in flammable ecosystems

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Natural and anthropogenic fire regimes Around the world flammable shrublands have traditionally been managed by fire to reduce canopy cover, increase forage production, and to get rid of predators and pests (Keeley et al 2012). Remaining surface fuels are typically removed by frequent controlled early-season patchburning (Laris and Wardell 2006, Archibald 2016) This traditional fire management practice typically creates an ignitionsaturated, fuel-limited fire regime, in which fire size and intensity is regulated by fuel quantity, quality, and spatial distribution (Pausas and Fernández-Muñoz 2012, Pausas and Keeley 2014). Frequent anthropogenic ignition over long time periods often created a more fine-grained landscape mosaic structure, because recently burnt patches are nonflammable until surface fuels have rebuilt (Baeza et al 2011, Johansson and Granström 2014) In shrublands this can take several years, and in such cases young stands act as fuel-breaks in the landscape, limiting the size of consecutive fires (Minnich and Chou 1997, Allen 2008, van Wilgen 2013, Johansson and Granström 2014)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call