Abstract

Crowd-sourced geographic information is becoming increasingly available, providing diverse and timely sources for updating existing spatial databases to facilitate urban studies, geoinformatics, and real estate practices. However, the discrepancies between heterogeneous datasets present challenges for automated change detection. In this paper, we identify important measurable factors to account for issues like boundary mismatch, large offset, and discrepancies in the levels of detail between the more current and to-be-updated datasets. These factors are organized into rule sets that include data matching, merge of the many-to-many correspondence, controlled displacement, shape similarity, morphology of difference parts, and the building pattern constraint. We tested our approach against OpenStreetMap and a Dutch topographic dataset (TOP10NL). By removing or adding some components, the results show that our approach (accuracy = 0.90) significantly outperformed a basic geometric method (0.77), commonly used in previous studies, implying a more reliable change detection in realistic update scenarios. We further found that distinguishing between small and large buildings was a useful heuristic in creating the rules.

Highlights

  • Crowd-sourced geographic data, such as OpenStreetMap (OSM), are collected at an unprecedented speed and updated every minute

  • Besides the known problems in data quality [1,2], such data sources can be used as timely sources for change detection and incremental update

  • We identified several measurable factors for change analysis that can properly handle boundary mismatch, levels of detail (LOD) differences, generalization, and non-systematic offset that exist between datasets and are commonly encountered in current database update scenarios

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Crowd-sourced geographic data, such as OpenStreetMap (OSM), are collected at an unprecedented speed and updated every minute. Commercial data providers usually have a quarterly update cycle for their navigation and points of interest (POI) data. This can lead to a situation where, though claimed to have better quality, professional data in many countries may always be outdated compared with their crowd-sourced counterparts, at least in locations such as urban areas [4,5]. It is, reasonable to combine the strengths of both sides. Automated change detection is important for a continuous and incremental update mechanism

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call