Abstract

The interplay of genetic and environmental factors behind cognitive development has preoccupied multiple fields of science and sparked heated debates over the decades. Here we tested the hypothesis that developmental genes rely heavily on cognitive challenges—as opposed to natural maturation. Starting with a polygenic score (cogPGS) that previously explained variation in cognitive performance in adults, we estimated its effect in 344 children and adolescents (mean age of 12 years old, ranging from 6 to 25) who showed changes in working memory (WM) in two distinct samples: (1) a developmental sample showing significant WM gains after 2 years of typical, age-related development, and (2) a training sample showing significant, experimentally-induced WM gains after 25 days of an intense WM training. We found that the same genetic factor, cogPGS, significantly explained the amount of WM gain in both samples. And there was no interaction of cogPGS with sample, suggesting that those genetic factors are neutral to whether the WM gains came from development or training. These results represent evidence that cognitive challenges are a central piece in the gene-environment interplay during cognitive development. We believe our study sheds new light on previous findings of interindividual differences in education (rich-get-richer and compensation effects), brain plasticity in children, and the heritability increase of intelligence across the lifespan.

Highlights

  • During childhood, cognitive abilities dramatically improve to make us who we are: persons capable of multiple academic, social, and professional activities

  • The role of genetic factors in modulating the effect of experiences in cognitive development is a key question in developmental psychology, behavior genetics, and cognitive neuroscience

  • We showed that the amount of working memory (WM) change in both a longitudinal sample of typical development and an intervention sample of Effect of age and gender on WM

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Cognitive abilities dramatically improve to make us who we are: persons capable of multiple academic, social, and professional activities. We were able to sum the reported effect sizes of all available genetic markers to create polygenic scores for cognitive performance (cogPGS) for each individual in our sample—providing our study with a much

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call