Abstract
AbstractThe main focus of the first statistical disclosure limitation (SDL) techniques proposed in the literature was on providing sufficient disclosure protection. At that time, agencies paid only little attention to the negative impacts of these approaches on data utility. Over the years, more and more sophisticated methods evolved. However, these methods also became more complicated to implement and often required correction methods difficult to apply for nonstandard analysis. For these reasons, most agencies still tend to rely on standard, easy-to-implement SDL techniques such as data swapping or noise addition, although it has been shown repeatedly that these methods can have severe negative consequences on data utility and may even fail to fulfill their primary goal – to protect the data sufficiently (see, for example,Winkler (2007b)).
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.