Abstract

In this article I question the dominant assumptions of institutionalisation and change being smooth and linear processes driven by a single heroic institutional entrepreneur blessed with great foresight and purpose. Instead I combine institutional theory with the theoretical lexicon of the garbage can model to offer an alternative interpretation of an institutional story, in particular fitting for pluralistic practices in a relatively emerging, uncertain and heterogeneous field. I draw on a qualitative analysis of the rise of Dutch sustainability reporting and examine how the oftentimes collective and serendipitous interplay between problems, solutions, decision makers and decision moments shapes social order and institutions. I find that sustainability reporting’s development resembles a more collective form of institutional entrepreneurship as a range of actors muddled through and were involved in the enactment of historical contingencies that enabled action and change as problems, solutions, and partic...

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.