Abstract

Various modeling techniques are used to predict the capacity fade of Li-ion batteries. Algebraic reduced-order models, which are inherently interpretable and computationally fast, are ideal for use in battery controllers, technoeconomic models, and multi-objective optimizations. For Li-ion batteries with graphite anodes, solid-electrolyte-interphase (SEI) growth on the graphite surface dominates fade. This fade is often modeled using physically informed equations, such as square-root of time for predicting solvent-diffusion limited SEI growth, and Arrhenius and Tafel-like equations predicting the temperature and state-of-charge rate dependencies. In some cases, completely empirical relationships are proposed. However, statistical validation is rarely conducted to evaluate model optimality, and only a handful of possible models are usually investigated. This article demonstrates a novel procedure for automatically identifying reduced-order degradation models from millions of algorithmically generated equations via bi-level optimization and symbolic regression. Identified models are statistically validated using cross-validation, sensitivity analysis, and uncertainty quantification via bootstrapping. On a LiFePO4/Graphite cell calendar aging data set, automatically identified models utilizing square-root, power law, stretched exponential, and sigmoidal functions result in greater accuracy and lower uncertainty than models identified by human experts, and demonstrate that previously known physical relationships can be empirically “rediscovered” using machine learning.

Highlights

  • The simultaneous decrease of cost and increase of performance of lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) in recent years 1,2 has expanded their use from a longtime market niche of portable electronics to new markets, predominantly electric vehicles and stationary energy storage systems

  • This is because the capacity fade for common LIBs during calendar aging is dominated by a single degradation mechanism, the growth of the solid-electrolyte-interphase (SEI) at the graphite electrode, and the only experimental variables are time, ambient temperature, and cell state-of-charge (SOC)

  • Model identification is informed by known physical relationships, such as individual cell fade models assuming t0.5 behavior, which models SEI growth when it is rate-limited by the diffusion of neutral lithium through the SEI,[35,36,37] or SEI growth rate models based on Arrhenius or Tafel equations

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The simultaneous decrease of cost and increase of performance of lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) in recent years 1,2 has expanded their use from a longtime market niche of portable electronics to new markets, predominantly electric vehicles and stationary energy storage systems. The main challenge of utilizing a reduced-order battery lifetime model is in identifying an algebraic expression that predicts cell behavior accurately and extrapolates safely. This process is challenging for even the simplest battery degradation mechanisms. This is because the capacity fade for common LIBs during calendar aging is dominated by a single degradation mechanism, the growth of the solid-electrolyte-interphase (SEI) at the graphite electrode, and the only experimental variables are time, ambient temperature, and cell state-of-charge (SOC) This source of capacity loss is often categorized as the loss of lithium inventory (LLI). Derived and physically informed models can be compared to clarify the advantages or disadvantages of both approaches; presenting such a method and comparing the results with prior best-practices is the purpose of this work

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call