Abstract

Differential cross sections from fully microscopic calculations of inelastic proton scattering off 208Pb are compared to experimental scattering data for incident proton energies between 65 and 201 MeV. The required nucleon–nucleus interactions were formed by folding nuclear structure information with a reliable nucleon–nucleon effective interaction that has no adjustable parameter. The absence of phenomenological normalisation in our approach offers the possibility to interpret with confidence the calculated results in terms of the quality of the underlying nuclear structure description: a feature that had been reserved, until recently, to the electron probe. We have used this method to investigate the effect of long range correlations embedded in excited states on calculated inelastic observables and demonstrate the sensitivity of nucleon scattering predictions to details of the nuclear structure.

Highlights

  • A fully microscopic calculation of inelastic proton scattering off 208Pb is presented, and compared to experimental scattering data for incident proton energies between 65 and 201 MeV

  • The structure of ground and excited states of stable nuclei has extensively been probed with high energy electron scattering experiments

  • Proton inelastic scattering for heavy nuclei has already been modeled within several frameworks, but each of them either includes some phenomenological adjustment for the nucleon-nucleus (NA) interaction or/and the nuclear structure information, or relies on approximations whose effects are not well controlled

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A fully microscopic calculation of inelastic proton scattering off 208Pb is presented, and compared to experimental scattering data for incident proton energies between 65 and 201 MeV. Proton inelastic scattering for heavy nuclei has already been modeled within several frameworks, but each of them either includes some phenomenological adjustment for the nucleon-nucleus (NA) interaction or/and the nuclear structure information, or relies on approximations whose effects are not well controlled.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.