Abstract

The aim of this chapter is to summarise and reflect on the diverse perspectives put forward in this book for challenging racial bias in forensic psychology assessment and testing. To achieve this, I have divided my summary and observation into three broad themes. The first is devoted to construct validity, a common theme that seems to run through many of the topics covered in this book. In this section, I highlight limitations of construct validity in standardised forensic psychology assessment and testing practices, and suggest the need for a paradigm shift or epistemic reform to recognise and legitimatise cultural knowledge. The second theme focuses on the integral role of ethical practice in forensic psychology assessment and testing, and I indicate some of ways in which ethical practice can be utilised to challenge and minimise bias. In third section, I discuss cross-cultural competence, stressing on the importance of cross-cultural case formulation, evidence-based professional supervision, and reflective practice.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call