Abstract

The current space arena has changed significantly since the 1950s, when outer space activities commenced. At the time of the adoption of the Outer Space Treaty (and the related General Assembly Resolutions), the outer space arena was largely dominated by the political interests of the two major space powers, the USA and the (then) USSR. Although states have remained the primary actors in regulating the use of outer space, the extent to which private companies would become involved in the exploration and use of space was not envisaged at the time of the conclusion of the space treaties. It is particularly the involvement of private space actors that complicates the traditional understanding of the prohibition on territorial sovereignty in outer space. With specific reference to the outer space boundary, the principle of the common heritage of humankind and property rights in outer space, this contribution aims to highlight some of the challenges to the prohibition of sovereignty in view of current developments in the arena of outer space. This analysis suggests that the blanket prohibition on sovereignty in outer space should be re-evaluated in order to keep up with the fast developing technological advancements in space exploration, and that clear legal rules be developed to provide legal certainty for all role players.

Highlights

  • In his address before the 18th General Assembly of the United Nations on 20 September 1963, the President of the United States of America (USA), John F Kennedy, stated that [s]pace offers no problems of sovereignty; by resolution of this Assembly, the members of the United Nations have foresworn any claim to territorial rights in outer space or on celestial bodies, and declared that international law and the United Nations Charter will apply.1Since this statement, the arena of outer space has changed significantly

  • At the time of the adoption of the Outer Space Treaty, the outer space arena was largely dominated by the political interests of the two major space powers, the USA and the () USSR

  • At the time of the adoption of the Outer Space Treaty3, outer space was largely dominated by the political interests of the two major space powers, the USA and () USSR

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In his address before the 18th General Assembly of the United Nations on 20 September 1963, the President of the United States of America (USA), John F Kennedy, stated that [s]pace offers no problems of sovereignty; by resolution of this Assembly, the members of the United Nations have foresworn any claim to territorial rights in outer space or on celestial bodies, and declared that international law and the United Nations Charter will apply.. In his address before the 18th General Assembly of the United Nations on 20 September 1963, the President of the United States of America (USA), John F Kennedy, stated that [s]pace offers no problems of sovereignty; by resolution of this Assembly, the members of the United Nations have foresworn any claim to territorial rights in outer space or on celestial bodies, and declared that international law and the United Nations Charter will apply.1 Since this statement, the arena of outer space has changed significantly. It is suggested that the blanket prohibition on sovereignty is no longer tenable and that it should be re-evaluated to keep up with the fast-developing technological advancements in space exploration

Boundary of outer space6
Common heritage of humankind
Commercialisation of outer space
Property rights and appropriation
The way forward for space governance?
Conclusion
Literature

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.