Abstract

BackgroundJos has witnessed a series of civil crises which have generated mass casualties that the Jos University Teaching Hospital has had to respond to from time to time. We review the challenges that we encountered in the management of the victims of the 2001 crisis.MethodologyWe reviewed the findings of our debriefing sessions following the sectarian crisis of September 2001 and identified the challenges and obstacles experienced during these periods.ResultsCommunication was a major challenge, both within and outside the hospital. In the field, there was poor field triage and no prehospital care. Transportation and evacuation was hazardous, for both injured patients and medical personnel. This was worsened by the imposition of a curfew on the city and its environs. In the hospital, supplies such as fluids, emergency drugs, sterile dressings and instruments, splints, and other consumables, blood and food were soon exhausted. Record keeping was erratic. Staff began to show signs of physical and mental exhaustion as well as features of anxiety and stress. Tensions rose between different religious groups in the hospital and an attempt was made by rioters to attack the hospital. Patients suffered poor subsequent care following resuscitation and/or surgery and there was neglect of patients on admission prior to the crisis as well as non trauma medical emergencies.ConclusionMass casualties from disasters that disrupt organized societal mechanisms for days can pose significant challenges to the best of institutional disaster response plans. In the situation that we experienced, our disaster plan was impractical initially because it failed to factor in such a prolongation of both crisis and response. We recommend that institutional disaster response plans should incorporate provisions for the challenges we have enumerated and factor in peculiarities that would emanate from the need for a prolonged response.

Highlights

  • In a mass casualty situation, there is a sudden presentation of large numbers of injured people at a rate that exceeds the capacity of the institution to cope [1]

  • Communication was needed for mobilizing personnel and other resources from within and outside the hospital, and for information and media management as well as the coordination of response efforts between medical personnel and other agencies of government involved in the disaster response such as the police, military, Red Cross, and other voluntary organizations

  • We have since incorporated most of the lessons learned from the Jos crisis of 2001 into our institutional preparedness for disaster response and these have improved our response to three subsequent major crises in November 2008, January 2010 and December 2010

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In a mass casualty situation, there is a sudden presentation of large numbers of injured people at a rate that exceeds the capacity of the institution to cope [1]. Traditional institutional response to such situations involves expanding of the surge capacity by mobilizing additional resources from within the hospital to provide care for the injured patients [2]. This involves mobilization of staff from other parts of the hospital to the accident and emergency department and a call out system for staff that are outside the hospital [3]. We present challenges faced in the management of this mass casualties. We review the challenges that we encountered in the management of the victims of the 2001 crisis

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call