Abstract

Airborne laser scanning (ALS) and digital aerial photogrammetry (DAP) have both been demonstrated as reliable sources of information on forest stand inventory attributes. The increasing availability of both datasets provides a means for improving stand dynamics information over time; however, the cost of multi-temporal ALS can be prohibitive in some circumstances. As a result, a combination of ALS at an initial time step and subsequent updates using DAP has been proposed as a cost-effective alternative for maintaining forest inventories. In this study we used low density ALS and DAP point clouds acquired in 2007 and 2015, respectively, to quantify changes in forest structure, in a highly disturbed boreal mixedwood forest in Alberta, Canada. We examined the capacity of the two technologies to model changes in top height (H), volume (V), and basal area (BA) using both direct and indirect approaches for estimation. Results indicate that the proportion of explained variance (adjusted R2) for the models derived from the ALS (Time 1; T1) and DAP (Time 2; T2) data were highest for models predicting H at T1, and lowest for BA at T1 and T2 (R2 was 0.66–0.70). The indirect estimates of change in H, BA, and V were calculated by subtracting the T1 and T2 predictions. For the direct approach, separate regression models were developed that used the differences in point cloud metrics between T1 and T2 as predictors. Results indicated that the accuracy of the estimates generated using the indirect approach were markedly lower than the estimates generated using the direct approach, with especially poor results for ∆BA and ∆V. Best results were achieved for ∆H using the direct approach with an R2 coefficient of 0.65 and an root mean square error (RMSE)% of 190.06%. We found that the error associated with change estimates of H, BA and V increased with the increase or decrease in mortality. We conclude that forest managers should act carefully when applying the multi-temporal and multi-sensor analysis of forest growth if forest growth is slow and the level of mortality is high.

Highlights

  • Canadian boreal forests and woodlands cover approximately 347 Mha [1] making up nearly 10% of forest cover globally

  • We examined the capacity of Airborne laser scanning (ALS) and digital aerial photogrammetry (DAP) technologies to assess the change in top height (∆H), change in basal area per ha (∆BA), and change in total volume per ha (∆V) over roughly eight years in managed yet highly disturbed boreal forest stands near Slave Lake in central Alberta, Canada

  • The proportion of explained variance for the models derived from the ALS (T1) and DAP (T2) data were highest for models predicting HT1 and lowest for BAT1, BAT2, and BAT1, for which the R2 was 0.66–0.70 (Figure 2, Table 2)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Canadian boreal forests and woodlands cover approximately 347 Mha [1] making up nearly 10% of forest cover globally. One key component of sustainable forest management is the timely and accurate acquisition of forest information to quantify the amount and condition of forest resources This includes the evaluation of structural change over time, which can inform growth models critical for developing future predictions of forest inventory variables [3]. Two common methods may be used in developing the required point clouds: (1) Airborne laser scanning (ALS) technologies, which measure the time between emitted sensor pulses and received reflections [7]; and (2) digital aerial photogrammetry (DAP) which produces image-based outputs by matching points on stereo aerial photographs and calculating the parallax [8]. While ALS data can produce highly accurate vegetation profiles, repeated acquisitions for growth monitoring only from ALS can be costly and often involve trade-offs between the area covered and issues such as point density and scan angle [12]. A combination of the two technologies, with ALS as the initial measurement followed by updates of DAP, is seen as an optimal solution to obtain forest growth estimates over large spatial extents

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.