Abstract

Sub-Saharan African countries report high levels of growth and GDP per capita and yet they are unable to achieve the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) such as quality education and health. The paper argued that GDP might not be sufficient for measuring development because the funds obtained may not necessarily be used to improve the quality of life of worse off communities. Even with a constituent level of GDP, the problem of poverty and underdevelopment is becoming more intractable in Sub-Saharan Africa. This paper focused on the Challenges facing Sub-Saharan African countries in achieving the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). This was discussed after revealing growth in GDP and inequality trends in Sub-Saharan Africa. Using examples from countries like Nigeria, it is evident that many countries in Sub-Saharan Africa are unlikely to achieve their MDG targets due to persistence of poverty and other challenges such as corruption and mal-administration of funds. Moreover, the required growth to substantially reduce poverty is too high by international standards. The paper concluded by concurring with the view that redistribution of the growth increment of income is more likely to be effective in reducing poverty than growth in GDP alone. Therefore while growth in GDP may be prone to poverty reduction, it should be complemented with policies to ensure investment and broad participation, reduce violence, root out corruption and increase investment in infrastructure. The paper recommends that countries’ development strategies must take into consideration national realities in each country rather than adopting targets and policies from the western world.

Highlights

  • In September 2000, 147 Heads of states met at the United Nations (UN) head quarters in New York to resolve the most pressing problems of humanity and nature (Attaran, 2005) which include poverty, education, gender and health issues

  • This paper focused on the Challenges facing Sub-Saharan African countries in achieving the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs)

  • Peet and Hartwick (1999) cite that development is measured by the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and Gross National Product (GNP), measures of economic growth which assume that development is attained if a certain level of economic growth is reached

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In September 2000, 147 Heads of states met at the United Nations (UN) head quarters in New York to resolve the most pressing problems of humanity and nature (Attaran, 2005) which include poverty, education, gender and health issues. They expressed their commitment by setting numerical targets and deadlines to measure performance. Other authors including Easterly (2008) and Attaran (2005) concur with this view but question how the lack of progress is being measured They contend that most of the indicators used to measure the MDGs are insufficient and depend on unreliable or unavailable data. Each of the MDGs was discussed in conjunction with some of the challenges facing Sub-Saharan African countries in achieving them

Theoretical Foundation of MDGs
Trends in Economic Growth and Social Development in Sub-Saharan Africa
Review of Challenges to the Achievement of MDGs
Paradox of Economic Growth and Poverty Trends
The Dilemma in Conflict States
Over-reliance on Aid and Persistence of Poverty
Top-down Approach to MDGs
Are the MDGs Attainable?
Findings
Conclusion and Recommendations

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.