Abstract

The treatment of ultrapure water with electrochemically produced O3 is a common means for disinfection yet leads to the formation of a variety of reactive oxygen species (ROS). The present study draws a comprehensive comparison between three commonly used photometric and fluorometric assays for ROS analysis and quantifies the individual signal responses for dissolved O3, ·OH and H2O2, respectively, to account for cross-sensitivities. By calibrating all combinations of assays and analytes, we developed a quantification procedure to reliably determine the actual ROS composition in ultrapure water environments for different operation conditions of a membrane water electrolyzer with PbO2 anodes down to concentrations of 0.97 μg L−1. While the ·OH formation rate can be described linearly over the observed current density range, substantial O3 evolution is only found for current densities of 0.75 A cm−2 and above (up to 3.7 μmol h−1 for J = 1.25 A cm−2). The formation of H2O2 is only observed when an organic carbon source is introduced into the solution. We further quantify the interference of H2O2 with the reading of the oxidation-reduction potential as a common water parameter and elaborate on its validity to monitor the peroxone process when both H2O2 and O3 are present simultaneously.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.