Abstract
Georeferenced data are crucial for addressing societal spatial challenges, as most corporate and governmental information is location-compatible. However, many open-source solutions lack automation in geocoding while ensuring quality. This study evaluates the functionalities of various R packages and their integration with external APIs for converting postal addresses into geographic coordinates. Among the fifteen R methods/packages reviewed, tidygeocoder stands out for its versatility, though discrepancies in processing times and missing values vary by provider. The accuracy was assessed by proximity to original dataset coordinates (Madrid street map) using a sample of 15,000 addresses. The results indicate significant variability in performance: MapQuest was the fastest, ArcGIS the most accurate, and Nominatim had the highest number of missing values. To address these issues, an alternative web scraping methodology is proposed, substantially reducing the error rates and missing values, but raising potential legal concerns. This comparative analysis highlights the strengths and limitations of different geocoding tools, facilitating better integration of geographic information into datasets for researchers and social agents.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
