Abstract

With a rapidly growing world population and dwindling natural resources, we are now facing the enormous challenge of increasing crop yields while simultaneously improving the efficiency of resource utilization. Introduction of C4 photosynthesis into C3 crops is widely accepted as a key strategy to meet this challenge because C4 plants are more efficient than C3 plants in photosynthesis and resource usage, particularly in hot climates, where the potential for productivity is high. Lending support to the feasibility of this C3-to-C4 engineering, evidence indicates that C4 photosynthesis has evolved from C3 photosynthesis in multiple lineages. Nevertheless, C3-to-C4 engineering is not an easy task, as several features essential to C4 photosynthesis must be introduced into C3 plants. One such feature is the spatial separation of the two phases of photosynthesis (CO2 fixation and carbohydrate synthesis) into the mesophyll and bundle sheath cells, respectively. Another feature is the Kranz anatomy, characterized by a close association between the mesophyll and bundle sheath (BS) cells (1:1 ratio). These anatomical features, along with a C4-specific carbon fixation enzyme (PEPC), form a CO2-concentration mechanism that ensures a high photosynthetic efficiency. Much effort has been taken in the past to introduce the C4 mechanism into C3 plants, but none of these attempts has met with success, which is in my opinion due to a lack of system-level understanding and manipulation of the C3 and C4 pathways. As a prerequisite for the C3-to-C4 engineering, I propose that not only the mechanisms that control the Kranz anatomy and cell-type-specific expression in C3 and C4 plants must be elucidated, but also a good understanding of the gene regulatory network underlying C3 and C4 photosynthesis must be achieved. In this review, I first describe the past and current efforts to increase photosynthetic efficiency in C3 plants and their limitations; I then discuss a systems approach to tackling down this challenge, some practical issues, and recent technical innovations that would help us to solve these problems.

Highlights

  • About half a century ago, billions of people were on the brink of starvation

  • It is estimated that photosynthetic efficiency is less than 4.6% in C3 plants, whereas in C4 plants this number can reach 6% (Zhu et al, 2008)

  • The lower photosynthetic efficiency in C3 plants is due to a dual activity in the enzyme that fixes CO2, Ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (RuBisCO; Brown et al, 2011)

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

About half a century ago, billions of people were on the brink of starvation. this potential disaster was avoided, thanks to the Green Revolution, which dramatically improved crop yields by introducing crops of higher productivity as well as new measures and materials for crop management. The Green Revolution has been a major driving force for an agriculture that has so far met the need of a rapidly growing world population. The lower photosynthetic efficiency in C3 plants is due to a dual activity in the enzyme that fixes CO2, Ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (RuBisCO; Brown et al, 2011). The large number of C4 plants and independent events of C4 evolution suggest that the C3-to-C4 conversion is a relatively easy step in evolution These findings lend support to the feasibility of the C3-to-C4 engineering, which has drawn enormous interests (Hibberd et al, 2008; Furbank, 2017; Sedelnikova et al, 2018). C3-to-C4 engineering still poses an enormous challenge, as discussed below

Photosynthesis Is a Syndrome
Findings
Conclusion and Perspectives
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call