Abstract

CFD simulations of gas–liquid flows have been carried out in a full 3D, unsteady, Euler/Euler framework by means of the commercial software FLUENT®, and discussed in connection with laboratory scale bubble columns, with a particular interest in churn-turbulent flows. The importance of the choice of third order numerical schemes for such simulations was illustrated, as significant errors due to numerical diffusion can be induced by other less-stringent numerical set-ups. The available choices for turbulence modeling in RANS approach were tested following 9 different options, i.e., three possible formulations of the k – ε model (Standard, RNG, Realizable) combined with three different modalities to account for gas-phase effects (Dispersed, Dispersed+Bubble Induced Turbulence, Per-Phase). The Standard and Realizable versions of the k – ε model were unable to reproduce the expected gulf-stream patterns of bubble columns. However, the RNG k – ε model has exhibited much better descriptions of the flow features. The inclusion of bubble-induced terms in the turbulence equations led to minor impact on the performance of RNG k – ε models. The superior performance of RNG k – ε models essentially lies in the better depiction of the turbulent dissipation rate and turbulent viscosity. Thus, the application of RNG k – ε models would be also recommended for a further implementation of bubble population balance models.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.