Abstract

In the last 25 years, at least 10 dramatic morbilliviral epidemics have occurred among free-ranging pinniped and cetacean species and populations worldwide. The origin(s) of the new Morbillivirus genus members causing these mass mortality events, along with the reason(s) behind their “sudden” appearance among wild aquatic mammals, are still unknown (Di Guardo et al., 2005, 2011; Di Guardo, 2012). Interestingly enough, two recent papers have reported the existence of Cetacean morbillivirus (CeMV) strains infecting wild cetaceans (Tursiops aduncus and Sotalia guianensis, respectively) in the Southern Hemisphere (Groch et al., 2014; Stephens et al., 2014) and exhibiting marked genetic differences from those infecting cetaceans of the Northern Hemisphere (Van Bressem et al., 2009; Di Guardo et al., 2011; Di Guardo and Mazzariol, 2013). Albeit quantified only for the nucleoprotein (N) and phosphoprotein (P) genes, these differences are so consistent that one could question the inclusion of the concerned isolates into the CeMV clade. Furthermore, the agent recovered from the two T. aduncus individuals stranded along the Western Australia coastline was deemed to be, with exclusive reference to the N and P genes, the CeMV more closely related to Measles Virus (MeV) as well as to Peste des Petits Ruminants Virus (PPRV) and Rinderpest Virus (RPV), the archetype morbillivirus (Stephens et al., 2014). Intriguingly, no peculiar inflammatory lesions nor immunohistochemical (IHC) evidence of morbilliviral antigen were observed in the brain of these two animals (Stephens et al., 2014), differently from CeMV-infected cetaceans (Di Guardo and Mazzariol, 2013; Di Guardo et al., 2013) but also similarly to experimentally RPV-infected cattle (Wohlsein et al., 1993). In this respect, while CeMV sequences could be demonstrated in the brain and lung from approximately 40% of the striped dolphins (Stenella coeruleoalba) found stranded during the first mid of 2013 along the Tyrrhenian coast of Italy, IHC evidence of morbilliviral antigen was obtained from the brain of only one of these animals (Casalone et al., 2014). Nevertheless, the isolate(s) characterized from these dolphins, apart from being identical to each other, were also very similar to those responsible for the three previous epidemic outbreaks occurred throughout the last 25 years in the Western Mediterranean (Di Guardo and Mazzariol, 2013; Casalone et al., 2014). In conclusion, while more data are certainly needed on the genetic “make-up” of the newly discovered CeMV strains infecting cetaceans in the Southern Hemisphere (Groch et al., 2014; Stephens et al., 2014), it should be additionally emphasized that, despite the existence of single, highly valuable contributions in this field (Shimizu et al., 2013), a very limited body of knowledge is available on the host-related components as well as on the agent-related factors driving the complex Morbillivirus-cetacean interaction dynamics (Di Guardo, 2012).

Highlights

  • Novel Cetacean morbillivirus in Guiana dolphin, Brazil by Groch, K

  • Edited by: Hironori Sato, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Japan Reviewed by: Yukinobu Tohya, Nihon University, Japan

  • Enough, two recent papers have reported the existence of Cetacean morbillivirus (CeMV) strains infecting wild cetaceans (Tursiops aduncus and Sotalia guianensis, respectively) in the Southern Hemisphere (Groch et al, 2014; Stephens et al, 2014) and exhibiting marked genetic differences from those infecting cetaceans of the Northern Hemisphere (Van Bressem et al, 2009; Di Guardo et al, 2011; Di Guardo and Mazzariol, 2013)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Novel Cetacean morbillivirus in Guiana dolphin, Brazil by Groch, K. Cetacean morbillivirus in coastal indo-pacific bottlenose dolphins, Western Australia by Stephens, N., Duignan, P.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call