Abstract
Glucocorticoids are currently used to improve muscle strength and prolong ambulation in boys with DMD although the effect on bone health is still unclear. The aim of this study was to compare bone strength in healthy children and boys with DMD and investigate the interaction between diminished muscle function, loss of ambulation and high dose oral steroids, over a two year time frame. Fifty children were studied, 14 healthy boys (HB), 13 boys with DMD who remained ambulant (DMD-RA) and 23 boys with DMD who lost ambulation (DMD-LA). All boys with DMD had taken oral glucocorticoids. Peripheral quantitative computed tomography was used to measure bone geometry, density, strength and muscle mass of the non-dominant tibia and radius. Measurements were made at baseline, 12 and 24months at the distal metaphysis and mid diaphysis sites. Differences between the three groups were evaluated using ANOVA and a repeated measures model. There were no significant differences in age between the groups: mean age was 9.4, 8.7 and 8.8years for HB, DMD-RA and DMD-LA, respectively. There was no significant difference in steroid exposure between the DMD groups. However, boys who lost ambulation had significantly lower muscle function at baseline (North Star Ambulatory Assessment DMD-RA 23.6 vs. DMD-LA 18.8; p<0.05). At baseline, healthy boys had significantly greater trabecular bone density at the distal radius /ulna (23%/27%) and distal tibia/fibula (30%/46%) than boys with DMD (p<0.05). They also had significantly larger diaphyseal tibiae/fibulae (74%/36%) and radii/ulnae (49%/31%) with thicker corticies and consequently greater bone strength. In contrast, boys with DMD had greater cortical density (4%). Over time, there were small significant differences in the rate of change of both muscle and bone parameters between healthy boys and boys with DMD. For both ambulant and non-ambulant boys with DMD the greatest changes in cortical bone were evident at the tibia. After two years boys with DMD had on average, 63% less bone strength than healthy boys. However, the most strikingly significant difference was in trabecular bone density for boys who became non-ambulant. By 2years non-ambulant DMD boys had 53% less trabecular bone density at distal tibia than their healthy age matched peers compared with boys who remained ambulant who had 27% less trabecular bone density. In conclusion, bone and muscle strength is reduced for all boys with DMD even while they remain ambulant. However, tibia trabecular bone density loss is significantly accelerated in DMD boys who lose independent ambulation compared to DMD boys who remain ambulant despite equivalent levels of corticosteroid exposure.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have