Abstract

Cervical spine immobilization in penetrating cervical trauma is associated with an increased risk of indirect central neurological injury

Highlights

  • Current recommendations for cervical spine immobilization (CSI) were developed for blunt trauma patients and empirically extended to include patients with penetrating injury [1,2,3,4]

  • The purpose of this study is to examine the relationship between penetrating cervical trauma and the development of central neurologic injury with prophylactic CSI

  • Demographics, mechanism of injury and neurologic deficits were similar between the two groups, but mortality and the incidence of CSI in the Charity group was significantly higher than the Hurley group

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Current recommendations for CSI were developed for blunt trauma patients and empirically extended to include patients with penetrating injury [1,2,3,4]. CSI was designed to prevent progression of direct neurologic injury from cervical spine instability caused by CSFx and/or ligamentous injury. Cervical spine instability resulting from isolated ligamentous instability does not occur following penetrating cervical trauma making CSI unindicated in the absence of unstable CSFx. Unstable CSFx in association with neurologic salvageability has not been clearly shown to exist in the setting of penetrating cervical trauma. Unstable CSFx resulting from penetrating cervical trauma has been repeatedly associated with complete neurologic devastation in the surveyed literature. CSI has no demonstrated benefit in neurologically devastated patients [2]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.