Cerebrospinal Fluid Neurofilament Light as a Marker of Neuro-axonal Injury in Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus (P10-6.001)

Abstract

<h3>Objective:</h3> To compare Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) Neurofilament-light chain (NfL) and NfL/amyloid beta₄₂ (Abeta42) ratio levels in normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) patients with healthy controls (HC), Alzheimer’s disease (AD), and Frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD). <h3>Background:</h3> Levels of CSF NfL have been shown to be a marker of neuro-axonal injury and are elevated in neurodegenerative disease. One putative etiology of NPH involves axonal injury; however, low CSF Abeta42 has been reported in NPH. To control for the higher volume of CSF in NPH, the NfL/Abeta42 ratio was used. <h3>Design/Methods:</h3> 120 patients with CSF analysis: (a) 46 NPH: ventriculomegaly on MRI or CT, negative AD biomarkers, clinical symptoms of NPH, improvement in gait after tap test; (b) 39 FTLD: 5 behavioural-variant frontotemporal dementia, 14 corticobasal syndrome, 4 frontotemporal dementia with motor neuron disease, 12 progressive supranuclear palsy, 2 semantic-variant primary progressive aphasia (PPA), and 2 non-fluent PPA; (c) 29 AD; and (d) 6 HC. Levels of CSF NfL were measured using single molecule array (Simoa) technology while Abeta42 was measured using a sandwich ELISA method (Innotest). All statistical analyses were corrected for multiple comparisons and age. <h3>Results:</h3> Log transformed NfL levels in the NPH group were significantly higher than HC (p &lt; 0.05), but lower than FTLD and AD group (p &lt;0 .001). Log transformed CSF NfL/Abeta42 ratio was significantly higher in the NPH group compared to HC (p&lt;0.05); but no significant difference with FTLD and AD groups. <h3>Conclusions:</h3> Intermediate CSF NfL levels in NPH patients suggest that there is some neuro-axonal injury present - although less than in FTLD and AD. Further investigations are warranted to determine whether the NfL normalizes after shunting or the neuroaxonal injury is irreversible. NfL in NPH may help elucidate the pathophysiology of the disease. <b>Disclosure:</b> Ms. Davenport has nothing to disclose. Dr. Taghdiri has nothing to disclose. Anna Vasilevskaya has nothing to disclose. Ms. Anastassiadis has received research support from Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé (FRQS). Dr. Thapa has nothing to disclose. Dr. Dimal has nothing to disclose. Namita Multani, 14039 has nothing to disclose. Dr. Fasano has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving as a Consultant for Abbott. Dr. Fasano has received personal compensation in the range of $10,000-$49,999 for serving as a Consultant for Abbvie. Dr. Fasano has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Ipsen. Dr. Fasano has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving as a Consultant for Medtronic. Dr. Fasano has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving as a Consultant for Boston Scientific. Dr. Fasano has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Abbott. Dr. Fasano has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Medtronic. Dr. Fasano has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Sunovion. Dr. Fasano has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Ceregate. The institution of Dr. Fasano has received research support from Boston Scientific. The institution of Dr. Fasano has received research support from Medtronic. The institution of Dr. Fasano has received research support from Abbvie. Dr. Fasano has received publishing royalties from a publication relating to health care. Dr. Tang-Wai has nothing to disclose. Dr. Tartaglia has received personal compensation in the range of $0-$499 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Roche. The institution of Dr. Tartaglia has received research support from NIH. The institution of Dr. Tartaglia has received research support from University of Toronto.