Abstract

BackgroundCerebral small vessel disease (SVD) has previously been associated with worse stroke outcome, vascular dementia, and specific post-stroke cognitive deficits. The underlying causal mechanisms of these associations are not yet fully understood. We investigated whether a relationship between SVD and certain stroke aetiologies or a specific stroke lesion anatomy provides a potential explanation. MethodsIn a retrospective observational study, we examined 859 patients with first-ever, non-SVD anterior circulation ischemic stroke (age = 69.0±15.2). We evaluated MRI imaging markers to assess an SVD burden score and mapped stroke lesions on diffusion-weighted MRI. We investigated the association of SVD burden with i) stroke aetiology, and ii) lesion anatomy using topographical statistical mapping. ResultsWith increasing SVD burden, stroke of cardioembolic aetiology was more frequent (ρ = 0.175; 95 %-CI = 0.103;0.244), whereas cervical artery dissection (ρ = -0.143; 95 %-CI = -0.198;-0.087) and a patent foramen ovale (ρ = -0.165; 95 %-CI = -0.220;-0.104) were less frequent stroke etiologies. However, no significant associations between SVD burden and stroke aetiology remained after additionally controlling for age (all p>0.125). Lesion-symptom-mapping and Bayesian statistics showed that SVD burden was not associated with a specific stroke lesion anatomy or size. ConclusionsIn patients with a high burden of SVD, non-SVD stroke is more likely to be caused by cardioembolic aetiology. The common risk factor of advanced age may link both pathologies and explain some of the existing associations between SVD and stroke. The SVD burden is not related to a specific stroke lesion location.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.