Abstract

Several criteria for time-consuming volumetric measurements of progressive supranuclear palsy Richardson syndrome subtype (PSP-RS) have been proposed. These often require image reconstruction in different planes for proper assessment. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the cerebral peduncle angle as a simple and reproducible measure of midbrain atrophy in patients with PSP-RS. The records of 15 patients with PSP-RS were retrospectively identified. The records of 31 age-matched healthy control subjects, 15 patients with multiple-system atrophy, and 22 patients with Parkinson disease were included for comparison. Two neuroradiologists individually assessed these studies for midbrain atrophy by evaluating the cerebral peduncle angle, that is, the angle between the two cerebral peduncles. The cerebral peduncle angle measurements were 62.1° (SD, 6.8°) in PSP-RS patients, 51.2° (SD, 10.1°) in healthy control subjects, 55.7° (SD, 11.6°) in patients with multiple-system atrophy, and 53.7° (SD, 8.5°) in patients with Parkinson disease. A statistically significant difference was found in the cerebral peduncle angle measurements (observer 1, p = 0.015; observer 2, p = 0.004) between the PSP-RS patients and the other subgroups. Bland-Altman analysis showed a bias of 0.6° (95% limits of agreement, 6.9°, -5.8°), and intraobserver variability analysis showed a bias of 0.5° (4.1°, -3°). The cerebral peduncle angle is a simple, easy-to-calculate, and reproducible measure of midbrain atrophy. It is a useful criterion for differentiating patients with PSP-RS from healthy persons and from patients with multiple-system atrophy or Parkinson disease.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.