Abstract

The “specialization” of the right hemisphere for spatial attention is widely accepted but poorly understood. While several theories have been supported by studies of patients with acute hemispatial neglect, generalizability beyond this population remains unclear. In this study, we compared the predictions of two attention models [Brain 119 (1996) 841; Trans. Am. Neurol. Assoc. 95 (1970) 143] when applied to data obtained from subjects with unilateral right- or left-cerebral lesions, but without clinical evidence of neglect during a visual search task. Both Left Lesion and Right Lesion subjects detected fewer targets in the contralesional hemispace. However, the Right Lesion subjects also made fewer visual fixations and longer saccades in the contralesional hemispace, suggesting a fundamental alteration in the architecture of visual search. The spatial distribution of fixations made by Right Lesion subjects more closely fits the prediction of a “salience” model than of the strict interpretation of a linear “gradient” model. These data support the long-standing notion of right hemisphere dominance for spatial attention, especially for the top–down processes entailed in self-directed visual search, and extend this to lesion patients without clinically evident neglect. A theoretical model based on the salience of extrapersonal space appears useful for understanding alterations of attentional allocation, particularly after recovery from stroke.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.