Abstract
The authors compared radionuclide cerebral dynamic studies, brain scans, and clinical evaluation as indicators of recurrence of intracranial anaplastic gliomas and found cerebral dynamic studies more sensitive to tumor growth than static brain scans. The former may show changes prior to clinical evidence of tumor progression.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
