Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of a new ultrashort contrast-enhanced (CE) MR angiography (MRA) for the morphologic evaluation of cerebral arteriovenous malformations (AVMs). The method was compared with conventional X-ray digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and time-of-flight (TOF) MRA in 22 patients to assess the angioarchitecture of the malformations which is essential for treatment planning and follow-up. Two experienced MR readers independently evaluated both techniques with regard to the assessment of feeding arteries, AVM nidus, and venous drainage patterns. Contrast-enhanced MRA was able to detect all AVMs seen on DSA, whereas the TOF MRA failed in 1 patient with a very small AVM. In the assessment of the different vessel components of the AVM there was no difference for the detection and delineation of feeding arteries and the AVM. The venous drainage patterns could always be clearly delineated in the CE MRA, whereas TOF MRA could demonstrate the exact venous drainage in only 9 patients. Contrast-enhanced MRA was found to be superior to conventional TOF MRA in the assessment of the angioarchitecture of cerebral AVMs especially regarding the assessment of the venous drainage patterns. The superiority is supported by the improved vessel-to-background contrast and contrast-to-noise ratios. The major limitations of this new technique consist of a low spatial resolution at the used time resolution which can be improved by further sequence modifications. Contrast-enhanced MRA is thus an important additional imaging technique for treatment planning and follow-up of AVMs.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.