Abstract

Clean water supply is an essential element for the entire sustainable human society, and the economic and technology development. Membrane filtration for water and wastewater treatments is the premier choice due to its high energy efficiency and effectiveness, where the separation is performed by passing water molecules through purposely tuned pores of membranes selectively without phase change and additional chemicals. Ceramics and polymers are two main candidate materials for membranes, where the majority has been made of polymeric materials, due to the low cost, easy processing, and tunability in pore configurations. In contrast, ceramic membranes have much better performance, extra-long service life, mechanical robustness, and high thermal and chemical stabilities, and they have also been applied in gas, petrochemical, food-beverage, and pharmaceutical industries, where most of polymeric membranes cannot perform properly. However, one of the main drawbacks of ceramic membranes is the high manufacturing cost, which is about three to five times higher than that of common polymeric types. To fill the large gap between the competing ceramic and polymeric membranes, one apparent solution is to develop a ceramic-polymer composite type. Indeed, the properly engineered ceramic-polymer composite membranes are able to integrate the advantages of both ceramic and polymeric materials together, providing improvement in membrane performance for efficient separation, raised life span and additional functionalities. In this overview, we first thoroughly examine three types of ceramic-polymer composite membranes, (i) ceramics in polymer membranes (nanocomposite membranes), (ii) thin film nanocomposite (TFN) membranes, and (iii) ceramic-supported polymer membranes. In the past decade, great progress has been made in improving the compatibility between ceramics and polymers, while the synergy between them has been among the main pursuits, especially in the development of the high performing nanocomposite membranes for water and wastewater treatment at lowered manufacturing cost. By looking into strategies to improve the compatibility among ceramic and polymeric components, we will conclude with briefing on the perspectives and challenges for the future development of the composite membranes.

Highlights

  • Thebe low flux and fouling tendency due tohydrophobicity hydrophobicity ofpolymer polymer membranes could be mitigated byhigh the rise in the tendency published papers on the ceramic-polymer composite membranes, which have fouling due to hydrophobicity of polymer membranes could be mitigated by the addition of certain hydrophilic ceramic materials

  • Ceramic fillers in polymer memIn this overview, we first examine the different types of inorganic-organic composite membranes and recent progress of these ceramic-polymer composite membranes for water treatment, treatment, in in three three categories: categories: (i)

  • In the case of ceramic-supported polymeric membrane, porous ceramic support is prepared first by sintering and polymeric top layer is deposited by techniques such as dip coating, spin coating etc

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Due to the low cost and high efficiency, membrane technology has been widely employed for the production of various types of water [5], dialysis of blood and urine [6], ion separation in the electrochemical processes [7], and filtration of particulates from liquid suspensions [8]. In poly-vinyl acetate two components, which is the key to successfully fabrication of high performance and In addition to the poor life span, most of these polymeric membranes are inherently hydroaddition to the poor composite life span, most of these are polymeric membranes areperspectives inherently hydrostable ceramic-polymer membranes, discussed. The and phobic to certain extent, leading to low water flux, high fouling tendency, which often phobic to extent, leading tooflow flux, high fouling tendency, whichwill often challenges forcertain the future development thewater ceramic-polymer composite membranes causes even shorter lifetime and higher operating cost.

Composite
Simultaneous enhancement of flux and rejection
Addition of antibacterial and photocatalytic properties
Disadvantages of Composite Membranes
Ceramic-Polymer Composite Membrane
Ceramic-Supported
O3 tubular
Strategies to Fabricatepolymer
Modification of Ceramic Nanoparticles
Surface Modification
Surface Functionalization on in Ceramic
Organic Grafting
Modification of Polymers
Modification of Bulk Polymer Matrix
Surface Modification of Polymer Matrixes
Direct Deposition of Ceramic NPs in Polymer Matrixes
Perspective
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call