Abstract

CePO4 catalyst (termed Ce–P–O) was for the first time employed to capture elemental mercury (Hg0) under simulated coal-fired flue gas conditions. As compared with commercial SCR catalyst (i.e., V–W–Ti), the Ce–P–O catalyst showed a much better performance in Hg0 removal. The high Hg0 adsorption capacity, abundant active oxygen species, and excellent SO2 poisoning resistance account for the performance of the Ce–P–O catalyst. When the catalyst was subjected to individual flue gas component conditions, it was found that the presence of NO can significantly improve the Hg0 removal efficiency over the Ce–P–O catalyst; however, HCl did not show promotion effect. It is proposed that the former occurs because the generated NO2 (originated from NO oxidation) could react with Hg0 ad-species (e.g., Hg2O), regenerating the HgO and hence enhancing the Hg0 chemisorption. The latter was found to be due to the absence of the Deacon reaction over the catalyst.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.