Abstract
This paper intends to link CEOs’ adverse early-life experiences to accounting policy choice, by investigating whether a CEO’s Great Chinese Famine experience impacted on corporate accounting conservatism. Our results show that companies whose CEOs had famine experience in their early life used more conservative accounting. We also find that the positive association between the CEO’s famine experience and accounting conservatism is moderated by firm ownership structure and environmental uncertainties. Additional tests suggest that the CEOs who experienced famine during their youth had a greater impact on accounting conservatism. By using the exogenous variation in local severity of the famine, we confirm the causal relationship between CEOs’ early-life famine experience and the level of accounting conservatism. Our study contributes to the accounting policy choice literature, and results are robust for several other robustness tests. We argue that the CEO will apply the risk sensitivity learned from the famine experience to the company’s accounting policy decisions to meet the obligations of the contracting parties and other stakeholders.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.