Abstract
This paper investigates whether CEO pay disparity reflects efficient contracting or CEO entrenchment by exploiting an exogenous event which mandated option expensing, namely, the introduction of FAS 123R. Using a difference-in-difference approach, we find supportive evidence for the entrenchment hypothesis. Firms characterised by high pay disparity exhibit a significantly larger decline in options pre-versus post-FAS 123R than those characterised by low pay disparity. At the same time, firms with high pay disparity switch to salary more so than firms characterised by low pay disparity, consistent with entrenched CEOs preferring non-performance-based pay. Our findings suggest CEOs in high pay disparity firms exploited the free accounting cost advantage of options to inflate their pay rather than for their convexity property. These results are robust to alternative functional forms and measures of CEO pay disparity.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
