Abstract
This paper investigates the extent to which Australian CEOs are compensated following the completion of mergers and acquisition (M&A) deals with reference to the incentive alignment and managerial power perspective. Findings reveal that CEOs of acquiring firms significantly receive higher compensation in the year of completing M&As and one year after. This higher compensation is presented in all forms: bonus only, salary only, salary and bonus, and total compensation. It is also found that the incentive alignment and managerial power approach are not mutually exclusive and they both can have some degrees of explaining the variation of CEO compensation following mergers. We find a positive correlation between CEO compensation and firm performance, measures of CEO’s effort and skill in completing the deal. However, we observe that CEOs of bidding firms have significantly lower bonus and total compensation if there is any entrenchment in the CEO governance process (i.e. CEO is also a chair of the board, or a member of the nominating committee). This result is sharply opposite to the US evidence (Gristein and Hribar (2004)) where CEO compensation after mergers is significantly driven by CEO power. Overall our findings is more consistent with the predictions of the incentive alignment theory rather than the managerial power theory.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
