Abstract
How special is Centros? This contribution places Centros in internal market law. It starts by turning the judgment on its head and imagines an alternative Centros: the judgment that the Danish authorities had wished for and which the Court declined to hand down. The aim of this exercise in legal fiction is to show that the Court could have decided Centros in another way. The choices underpinning Centros are then contrasted with other internal market cases to conclude that both the real Centros and the alternative Centros are in some ways aligned with the free movement case law. It is argued that Sayde’s analysis of abuse best helps to make sense of this confusing state of play. The article ends with suggestions for further research: taking the cost dimension into account in a behavioural perspective could shed light on the allocation of regulatory powers between home state and host state.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
