Abstract

The great hammerhead is denser than water, and hence relies on hydrodynamic lift to compensate for its lack of buoyancy, and on hydrodynamic moment to compensate for a possible misalignment between centres of mass and buoyancy. Because hydrodynamic forces scale with the swimming speed squared, whereas buoyancy and gravity are independent of it, there is a critical speed below which the shark cannot generate enough lift to counteract gravity, and there are anterior and posterior centre-of-mass limits beyond which the shark cannot generate enough pitching moment to counteract the buoyancy–gravity couple. The speed and centre-of-mass limits were found from numerous wind-tunnel experiments on a scaled model of the shark. In particular, it was shown that the margin between the anterior and posterior centre-of-mass limits is a few tenths of the product between the length of the shark and the ratio between its weight in and out of water; a diminutive 1% body length. The paper presents the wind-tunnel experiments, and discusses the roles that the cephalofoil and the pectoral and caudal fins play in longitudinal balance of a shark.

Highlights

  • In order to swim along a straight path at constant speed and depth, the forces and moments acting on a shark should cancel out

  • A negatively buoyant shark will need hydrodynamic lift to cancel out the excess weight, thrust to cancel out the drag, and hydrodynamic pitching moment to cancel out the buoyancy–gravity couple

  • A representative set of wind-tunnel results can be found in figure 3, where lift, drag and pitching moment coefficients are displayed as functions of the angle of attack α for five angles of the cephalofoil δc and a single setting of the pectoral fins δpf = 0

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In order to swim along a straight path at constant speed and depth, the forces and moments acting on a shark should cancel out. A negatively buoyant shark will need hydrodynamic lift to cancel out the excess weight (the difference between gravity and buoyancy), thrust to cancel out the drag, and hydrodynamic pitching moment to cancel out the buoyancy–gravity couple (figure 1). Because all hydrodynamic forces scale with swimming speed squared, whereas gravity and buoyancy are independent of it, there is a critical speed below which a negatively buoyant shark will not be able to generate enough hydrodynamic lift to counteract the excess weight, and there are anterior and posterior limits on the centre-of-mass position beyond which the shark will not be able to generate enough hydrodynamic moment to counteract the hydrostatic couple.

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.