Abstract
In a centralized decision-making environment, the central unit supervises all the operating units’ production activities and focuses on achieving the overall goals of the entire organization from a global viewpoint by allocating available resources to them. However, all the current models about resource allocation under the centralized decision-making commonly exhibit the non-unique optimal solutions and neglect the competition and trade-off among all the DMUs to maximize the individual aggregated output of each DMU. This phenomenon makes the allocation result imbalanced and unacceptable to all the DMUs. To overcome this problem, this paper introduces Nash bargaining game theory to develop a new centralized resource allocation model which not only takes into account the overall goals of the organization from an overall perspective, but also considers competition and trade-off among all the DMUs. Finally, an empirical example is used to demonstrate the applicability of our proposed approach. The results show that our Nash bargaining game model not only guarantees the uniqueness of the optimal resource allocation results, but also improves the balance of the resource allocation result, which makes it acceptable to all the DMUs.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.