Abstract

Metastasectomy is probably underused in metastatic colorectal cancer. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of centralized repeated assessment on resectability rate of liver metastases. The prospective RAXO study was a nationwide study in Finland. Patients with treatable metastatic colorectal cancer at any site were eligible. This planned substudy included patients with baseline liver metastases between 2012 and 2018. Resectability was reassessed by the multidisciplinary team at Helsinki tertiary referral centre upfront and twice during first-line systemic therapy. Outcomes were resectability rates, management changes, and survival. Of 812 patients included, 301 (37.1 per cent) had liver-only metastases. Of these, tumours were categorized as upfront resectable in 161 (53.5 per cent), and became amenable to surgery during systemic treatment in 63 (20.9 per cent). Some 207 patients (68.7 per cent) eventually underwent liver resection or ablation. At baseline, a discrepancy in resectability between central and local judgement was noted for 102 patients (33.9 per cent). Median disease-free survival (DFS) after first resection was 20 months and overall survival (OS) 79 months. Median OS after diagnosis of metastatic colorectal cancer was 80, 32, and 21 months in R0-1 resection, R2/ablation, and non-resected groups, and 5-year OS rates were 68, 37, and 9 per cent, respectively. Liver and extrahepatic metastases were present in 511 patients. Of these, tumours in 72 patients (14.1 per cent) were categorized as upfront resectable, and 53 patients (10.4 per cent) became eligible for surgery. Eventually 110 patients (21.5 per cent) underwent liver resection or ablation. At baseline, a discrepancy between local and central resectability was noted for 116 patients (22.7 per cent). Median DFS from first resection was 7 months and median OS 55 months. Median OS after diagnosis of metastatic colorectal cancer was 79, 42, and 17 months in R0-1 resection, R2/ablation, and non-resected groups, with 5-year OS rates of 65, 39, and 2 per cent, respectively. Repeated centralized resectability assessment in patients with colorectal liver metastases improved resection and survival rates.

Highlights

  • Hepatic resection is considered potentially curative for patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs), with 5-year overall survival (OS) rates of 30–50 per cent[1]

  • Inclusion criteria were: histologically confirmed colorectal cancer with liver metastases at baseline; patient scheduled for first-line systemic therapy; age over 18 years; and signed written informed consent obtained according to Good Clinical Practice (GCP)

  • Were enrolled in this planned substudy, of whom 301 had metastatic colorectal cancer limited to the liver, and 511 had liver and extrahepatic metastases

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Hepatic resection is considered potentially curative for patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs), with 5-year overall survival (OS) rates of 30–50 per cent[1]. Resectability rates have been increasing as a result of improved surgical techniques and conversion therapy with chemotherapy and targeted agents[2,3,4,5,6]. There is a strong correlation between response to treatment and Received: September 07, 2020. Accepted: November 24, 2020 VC The Author(s) 2021. Metastasectomy is probably underused in metastatic colorectal cancer. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of centralized repeated assessment on resectability rate of liver metastases

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.