Abstract
This paper analyzes and compares several airport‐hub passenger‐terminal layouts in terms of average total walking distance. A second paper extends the results to include baggage‐handling operations. For the purposes of this research, most of the terminal layouts can be structured in three concepts: single, open concourses, closed‐loop concourses, and multiple piers. Regarding walking distance, all but one of the geometries have an optimal shape regardless of the proportion of transfers. Parallel piers should be shorter the farther away they are from the terminal block. A new inverted closed‐loop layout is shown to be best (for large terminals) and “fair” to all passenger types. It is also flexible: future growth can be accommodated by building radial piers. This defines a “sun” concept, which is recommended for planning consideration. An application illustrates the performance of the different layouts. The conclusion is that hub airports, with a high percentage of transfers, should have a different geometry than local airports, with a preponderance of departing and terminating traffic.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
