Abstract

Identifying influential spreaders in networks is an essential issue in order to prevent epidemic spreading, or to accelerate information diffusion. Several centrality measures take advantage of various network topological properties to quantify the notion of influence. However, the vast majority of works ignore its community structure while it is one of the main features of many real-world networks. In a recent study, we show that the centrality of a node in a network with non-overlapping communities depends on two features: Its local influence on the nodes belonging to its community, and its global influence on the nodes belonging to the other communities. Using global and local connectivity of the nodes, we introduced a framework allowing to redefine all the classical centrality measures (designed for networks without community structure) to non-overlapping modular networks. In this paper, we extend the so-called “Modular Centrality” to networks with overlapping communities. Indeed, it is a frequent scenario in real-world networks, especially for social networks where nodes usually belong to several communities. The “Overlapping Modular Centrality” is a two-dimensional measure that quantifies the local and global influence of overlapping and non-overlapping nodes. Extensive experiments have been performed on synthetic and real-world data using the Susceptible-Infected-Recovered (SIR) epidemic model. Results show that the Overlapping Modular Centrality outperforms its alternatives designed for non-modular networks. These investigations provide better knowledge on the influence of the various parameters governing the overlapping community structure on the nodes’ centrality. Additionally, two combinations of the components of the Overlapping Modular Centrality are evaluated. Comparative analysis with competing methods shows that they produce more efficient centrality scores.

Highlights

  • One can see that the relative difference of the outbreak size Δr is always positive for the global measure, while it is always negative for the local measure

  • This is due to the weak community structure strength of this network, which leads to a decrease in the effectiveness of the modular-based measures

  • Our approach is inspired by the idea that one needs to consider two types of influences for a node in a modular network: a local influence on the nodes belonging to their communities exerted through the intra-community links, and a global influence on the nodes of the remaining communities that goes through the inter-community links

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In ego-Facebook network, the local component of the Overlapping Modular Centrality outperforms the alternative measures. The Degree (a), Betweenness (b), Closeness (c) and Eigenvector (d) centrality measures derived from the Overlapping Modular centrality are compared to the standard counterpart designed for networks with no community structure. In networks with well-defined community structure (e.g., ego-Facebook network), the local component performs always better than the classical one with an average gain of 33% and 20% for Degree centrality, while the gain is around 23% and 19% for Betweenness centrality when employing LINKC and Louvain algorithms respectively.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call