Abstract

Research using techniques from social network analysis have expanded dramatically in recent years. The availability of network data and the recognition that social network techniques can provide an additional perspective have contributed to this expansion. Social network data are not always in a standard network form and, in many instances, consists of two distinct groups with ties between groups and no within group ties. For example, people attending events or meetings, authors collaborating on research outputs, or directors on boards of companies. Such data are known as two-mode data. Recently, Everett and Borgatti suggested a general approach for analyzing two-mode data. They suggested forming two one-mode data sets, analyzing these separately, and then recombining the results using the original data. One under-explored area in their work is in how this method can be applied to centrality problems; an issue we seek to begin to address here.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.