Central vs peripheral vascular factors determining risk of aortic dissection

Abstract

Hypertension is the commonest cause of “central” aortic dissection, despite being an “peripheral” arteriole disease. We hypothesised that known regional variations in peripheral organ perfusion, due to variation in arteriole tone, via its effect on differential head and neck vessel flows can alter the risk and location of central aortic dissection. This might help to explain why some hypertensive patients dissect their aorta and others don't despite having similar aortic geometry. We utilised a simple 2D computational fluid dynamic model to test our hypothesis. We hypothesise (1) that variations in “peripheral” organ flow can alter the site of “central” aortic dissection, despite the blood pressure and cardiac output being identical, (2) variations in cardiac output at rest may also help to explain the risk of dissection but not the site of the initial intimal tear, and (3) atrial fibrillation, a known factor for aortic dissection, increases the risk via stroke volume variation. MRI scanning, via regional aortic branch flow quantification, may help to identify individuals who have a family history of dissection/aneurysm, who are normotensive with normal aortic anatomy that have a high potential risk for dissection due to calculated high wall velocity/shear stresses. This may allow selective beta blocker prescriptions in an asymptomatic patient population that is at a predicted high risk of aortic dissection – a hither to unidentified patient subpopulation.