Abstract
PurposeThe venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide partial pressure difference (CO2 gap) has been reported to be a sensitive indicator of cardiac output adequacy. We aimed to assess whether the CO2 gap can predict postoperative adverse outcomes after cardiac surgery.MethodsA retrospective study was conducted of 5,151 patients from our departmental database who underwent cardiac surgery from 1 January 2008 to 31 December 2018. Lactate level (mmol·L−1), central venous oxygen saturation (ScVO2) (%), and the venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide difference (CO2 gap) were measured at intensive care unit (ICU) admission and on days 1 and 2 after cardiac surgery. The following postoperative adverse outcomes were collected: ICU mortality, hemopericardium or tamponade, resuscitated cardiac arrest, acute kidney injury, major bleeding, acute hepatic failure, mesenteric ischemia, and pneumonia. The primary outcome was the presence of at least one postoperative adverse outcome. Logistic regression was used to assess the association between ScVO2, lactate, and the CO2 gap with adverse outcomes. Their diagnostic performance was compared using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.ResultsThere were 1,933 patients (38%) with an adverse outcome. Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) parameters were similar between groups. The CO2 gap was slightly higher for the “adverse outcomes” group than for the “no adverse outcomes” group. Arterial lactate at admission, day 1, and day 2 was also slightly higher in patients with adverse outcomes. Central venous oxygen saturation was not significantly different between patients with and without adverse outcomes. The area under the ROC curve to predict outcomes after CPB for the CO2 gap at admission, day 1, and day 2 were 0.52, 0.55, and 0.53, respectively.ConclusionAfter cardiac surgery with CPB, the CO2 gap at ICU admission, day 1, and day 2 was associated with postoperative adverse outcomes but showed poor diagnostic performance.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.