Central venous access in oncology patients: A pragmatic approach to minimizing complications following port insertion.

Abstract

267 Background: Subcutaneous venous access devices, specifically implantable ports, are vital in the care of oncology patients. Despite routine use, complications remain prevalent. This retrospective single-institutional review was performed to identify rates of complications following port placement and target areas to improve patient outcomes. Methods: Retrospective analysis of 539 cancer patients who underwent port insertion in a one-year span at University of Florida was conducted. Data examining 18 potentially predictive factors was collected, and multivariate analysis was conducted using logistic regression and odds ratios with standard errors to determine predictive factors. Results: Of 539 patients, 100 (19%) experienced a complication, and 12 (2%) experienced 2 or more complications. An overall lower rate of complications was seen in patients on therapeutic anticoagulation (OR 0.17, p < 0.001) or on antiplatelet agents (OR 0.47, p = 0.02). No patients on therapeutic anticoagulation developed VTE (0%). Right-sided port insertion was associated with decreased rates of infection (OR 0.44, p = 0.04). Insertion as inpatient was associated with increased risk for mechanical failure (OR 4.60, p < 0.01) and catheter migration (OR 4.33, p < 0.01). Conclusions: This analysis identified multiple predictive factors that can potentially put patients at higher risk of complication following port insertion. A thorough risk assessment for VTE should be done prior to port insertion, and high-risk patients (i.e. prior VTE, Khorana score > 3) should be considered for prophylactic anticoagulation. Further analysis on optimal port insertion site (right/left) and location (inpatient/outpatient) are also targets that can potentially decrease complication rates. As ports inserted while inpatient had increased risk of both mechanical failure and catheter migration, and as ports inserted on the left side had increased risk of infectious complications, a prospective quality improvement initiative coordinated between Oncology and Interventional Radiology departments as to whether insertion of right-sided ports on an outpatient basis may improve outcomes is the next step in our investigation.