Central node dissection from the perspective of lateral neck node metastasis in papillary thyroid carcinoma

Abstract

ObjectivesControversy exists on how to handle central lymph nodes in papillary thyroid carcinoma, particularly regarding indications for prophylactic central neck dissection (CND). Central node metastases are more difficult to diagnose preoperatively than lateral node metastases. MethodsWe enrolled 493 patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma treated at our department in the past 22 years. Metastatic lymph nodes were diagnosed preoperatively mainly by ultrasonography. In principle, CND was performed for all cases; ipsilateral CND was performed for hemithyroidectomy, and bilateral CND was performed for total thyroidectomy. Lateral neck dissection (levels II to V; LND) was performed for metastases to lateral neck lymph nodes (clinical node (cN) 1b). ResultsThe cN stage was cN0 in 365 patients, cN1a in 10, and cN1b in 118. Of the 357 patients with stage cN0 who underwent CND, 42.9 % had pathologically positive nodes (pN+) in level VI, and of the 118 with stage cN1b who underwent CND, 78.0 % had pN+ in level VI. Cases with advanced T stage were significantly more common with pN+ in level VI. Level VI metastases were significantly associated with pN+ in level IV. As the total number of pN+ at each level of the lateral neck increased, the rate of patients with pN+ in level VI increased, and in patients with 3 or more pN+, about 85 % had level VI metastases. ConclusionBecause about half of the patients with cN0 patients had pN+ in level VI, and the rate of pN+ in level VI in each clinical T stage was 46 to 65 %, prophylactic CND should be performed, considering the various clinical benefits. Central nodes will have metastases in about 80 % of cases with lateral node metastases, requiring more accurate dissection. In lateral node metastases, there is a significant association between metastases in levels IV and VI.