Abstract

BackgroundIt is estimated that 22,800 children were living with an Acquired Brain Injury (ABI) (0.6% of children aged under 15 years) in Australia during 2003. Many children after a traumatic brain injury will experience difficulties with attention and concentration; a condition termed secondary Attention Deficit-Hyperactivity Disorder. There is conflicting evidence on whether treatment with stimulant therapy with medications such as methylphenidate or dexamphetamine will improve the attention and behavior of children with this condition.Methods/DesignSingle patient trials (n-of-1s or SPTs) evaluate the effect of titrated doses of psychostimulants methylphenidate or dexamphetamine compared to placebo on attention and behavior, in children with TBI and secondary ADHD. The aggregation of multiple SPTs will produce a population estimate of the benefit. Forty-two children will be registered into the trial through rehabilitation services at three large children’s hospitals in Australia. Patients will complete up to 3 cycles of treatment. Each cycle is 2 weeks long comprising seven days each of treatment and placebo, with the first two days of each cycle considered a washout period and the data not analysed. The order of treatment and placebo is randomly allocated for each cycle. The Conners’ Parent Rating Scales long forms will be employed to measure change in attention-deficit/hyperactivity and related problems of the child, and the primary outcome measure is the Conners’ Global Index Parent Version. Secondary outcomes include the teacher and child (if aged > 12 years) Conners’ Rating Scales, the Behaviour Rating Inventory of Executive Function among other measures. This study will provide high-level evidence using a novel methodological approach to inform clinicians about the most appropriate treatment for individual children. Through aggregation of individual trials, a population estimate of treatment effect will be provided to guide clinical practice in the treatment of children with secondary ADHD after a traumatic brain injury.DiscussionThis study employs an innovative methodological approach on the effectiveness of CNS stimulants for secondary ADHD from a brain injury. The findings will both guide clinicians on treatment recommendations, and inform the concept and acceptance of SPTs in paediatric research.Trial registrationAustralian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry. ACTRN12609000873224

Highlights

  • It is estimated that 22,800 children were living with an Acquired Brain Injury (ABI) (0.6% of children aged under 15 years) in Australia during 2003

  • It is estimated that 22,800 children were living with an ABI (0.6% of children aged under 15 years) in Australia during 2003 [2]

  • Study aims This study will test the efficacy of stimulant therapy with methylphenidate hydrochloride (MPH) or dexamphetamine (DEX) to improve attention and concentration, and executive dysfunction in children with traumatic brain injury compared to placebo by providing both a population and an individual estimate of treatment effect

Read more

Summary

Discussion

In Australia, 0.6% of children aged under 15 years are estimated to have experienced an ABI [2], with a fifth to one-half of the children will have a clinically significant attention disorder at up to 4 years after injury [5]. Recruiting sufficient numbers of children who have experienced a TBI into traditional RCTs is problematic; we propose an alternative methodology while providing high-level evidence Due to their cross-over design, aggregated SPTs have a smaller required sample size than their conventional parallel arm RCT counterparts for equivalent levels of statistical power, and are better at controlling for confounding [20]. An important component of the study is to test the efficacy of MPH or DEX on cognitive and behavioural outcomes in children, but to evaluate the acceptability, methodology and analytical aspects of employing this methodology in this patient population This information will contribute to proof-of-concept and ensure the acceptance of this method as a valuable and reliable research tool especially in drug trials where populations are difficult to recruit.

Background
Methods/Design
Findings
Australian Bureau of Statistics
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call