Abstract

Suppose that X={X t :tÂ?0} is a supercritical super Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process, that is, a superprocess with an Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process on $\mathbb{R}^{d}$ corresponding to $L=\frac{1}{2}\sigma^{2}\Delta-b x\cdot\nabla$ as its underlying spatial motion and with branching mechanism Â?(Â?)=Â?Â?Â?+AŸÂ? 2+Â?(0,+Â?)(e Â?Â?x Â?1+Â?x)n(dx), where Â?=Â?Â?Â?(0+)>0, AŸÂ?0, and n is a measure on (0,Â?) such that Â?(0,+Â?) x 2 n(dx)<+Â?. Let $\mathbb{P} _{\mu}$ be the law of X with initial measure μ. Then the process W t =e Â?Â?t Â?X t Â? is a positive $\mathbb{P} _{\mu}$ -martingale. Therefore there is W Â? such that W t Â?W Â?, $\mathbb{P} _{\mu}$ -a.s. as tÂ?Â?. In this paper we establish some spatial central limit theorems for X. Let $\mathcal{P}$ denote the function class $$ \mathcal{P}:=\bigl\{f\in C\bigl(\mathbb{R}^d\bigr): \mbox{there exists } k\in\mathbb{N} \mbox{ such that }|f(x)|/\|x\|^k\to 0 \mbox{ as }\|x\|\to\infty \bigr\}. $$ For each $f\in\mathcal{P}$ we define an integer Â?(f) in term of the spectral decomposition of f. In the small branching rate case Â? 2Â?(f)b. Our central limit theorems in the small and critical branching rate cases sharpen the corresponding results in the recent preprint of Miloś in that our limit normal random variables are non-degenerate. Our central limit theorems in the large branching rate case have no counterparts in the recent preprint of Miloś. The main ideas for proving the central limit theorems are inspired by the arguments in K. Athreya's 3 papers on central limit theorems for continuous time multi-type branching processes published in the late 1960's and early 1970's.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call