Abstract

Single point incremental forming (SPIF) is an emerging process that is well-known to be suited for fabrication in small series production. The aim of this paper was to determine the optimal input parameters of the process in order to minimise the maximum of both the axial and the in-plane components of the forming force achieved during SPIF and the surface roughness of the internal surface of truncated-cone drawpieces. Grade 2 pure titanium sheets with a thickness of 0.4 mm were used as the test material. The central composite design and response surface method was used to determine the number of experiments required to study the responses through building a second-order quadratic model. Two directions of rotation of the forming tool were also considered. The input parameters were spindle speed, tool feed rate, and step size. The mathematical relations were defined using the response surfaces to predict the surface roughness of the drawpieces and the components of the forming force. It was found that feed rate has an insignificant role in both axial and in-plane forming forces, but step size is a major factor affecting axial and radial forming forces. However, step size directly affects the surface roughness on the inner surfaces of the drawpieces. Overall, the spindle speed −579 rpm (clockwise direction), tool feed 2000 mm/min, and step size 0.5 mm assure a minimisation of both force components and the surface roughness of drawpieces.

Highlights

  • Single point incremental forming (SPIF) is based on obtaining the desired shape of the drawpiece without special tooling [1]

  • The issues related to the lubrication used and the methods of determining the coefficient of friction in SPIF have been discussed in a paper by Trzepiecinski and Lemu [17]

  • This paper investigated the process parameters influencing the surface roughness and components of the forming force in the SPIF of Grade 2 titanium sheets

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Single point incremental forming (SPIF) is based on obtaining the desired shape of the drawpiece without special tooling [1]. In the SPIF process, many parameters that determine the accuracy and quality of the treated surface are controllable [8,9]. Among these parameters, the most important are: forming speed, step size, tool diameter, forming angle, rotational speed of the tool, tool shape, and coating [10,11]. The choice of an appropriate lubricant depends on the deformation mechanisms that characterise the process [12,13,14]. The accuracy of SPIFshaped drawpieces depends on the anisotropy of the material’s mechanical properties and the springback phenomenon [15,16]. The issues related to the lubrication used and the methods of determining the coefficient of friction in SPIF have been discussed in a paper by Trzepiecinski and Lemu [17]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call