Abstract

Cochlear implant (CI) listeners have difficulty understanding speech in complex listening environments. This deficit is thought to be largely due to peripheral encoding problems arising from current spread, which results in wide peripheral filters. In normal hearing (NH) listeners, central processing contributes to segregation of speech from competing sounds. We tested the hypothesis that basic central processing abilities are retained in post-lingually deaf CI listeners, but processing is hampered by degraded input from the periphery. In eight CI listeners, we measured auditory nerve compound action potentials to characterize peripheral filters. Then, we measured psychophysical detection thresholds in the presence of multi-electrode maskers placed either inside (peripheral masking) or outside (central masking) the peripheral filter. This was intended to distinguish peripheral from central contributions to signal detection. Introduction of temporal asynchrony between the signal and masker improved signal detection in both peripheral and central masking conditions for all CI listeners. Randomly varying components of the masker created spectral-variance cues, which seemed to benefit only two out of eight CI listeners. Contrastingly, the spectral-variance cues improved signal detection in all five NH listeners who listened to our CI simulation. Together these results indicate that widened peripheral filters significantly hamper central processing of spectral-variance cues but not of temporal cues in post-lingually deaf CI listeners. As indicated by two CI listeners in our study, however, post-lingually deaf CI listeners may retain some central processing abilities similar to NH listeners.

Highlights

  • Cochlear implant (CI) listeners struggle to understand speech in complex environments whereas normal hearing (NH) listeners perform this task with apparent ease

  • Our findings supported the hypothesis that post-lingually deaf CI listeners retain certain central processing abilities, but these are severely impaired by poor peripheral encoding

  • We showed that: 1) central processing of timing remained intact in all CI listeners, whereas central processing of spectral-variance seemed to be maintained in only two out of eight CI listeners, and 2) simulating implant listening in NH listeners with normal central processing showed that broad peripheral filters limited the amount of spectral-variance release from central masking

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Cochlear implant (CI) listeners struggle to understand speech in complex environments whereas normal hearing (NH) listeners perform this task with apparent ease. Acoustic stimulation generates stochastic firing patterns with phase-locking in the low frequency regions of the auditory nerve, whereas CI electrical-stimulation strategies cause entrainment in the nerve (i.e. action potentials strictly synchronized to the electrical pulses) up to rates of 800 Hz for stimuli 1–2 dB above threshold [16,17,18,19] In addition to these differences in peripheral encoding, it is known that electrical stimulation causes neuroplastic changes in the central auditory system [20]. In spite of these central changes, we hypothesized that post-lingually deaf CI listeners may retain central processing abilities similar to NH listeners, but these abilities would be severely impaired by degraded peripheral encoding. Degraded peripheral encoding in CI listeners, likely limits the use of the spectral-variance cues by the central auditory system under electric stimulation

Ethical statement
Methods
Findings
Discussion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call