Abstract

BackgroundThe relationship between hospital surgical volume and outcome after colorectal cancer surgery has thoroughly been studied. However, few studies have assessed hospital surgical volume and failure-to-rescue (FTR) after colon and rectal cancer surgery. The aim of the current study is to evaluate FTR following colorectal cancer surgery between clinics based on procedure volume.MethodsPatients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery in Sweden from January 2015 to January 2020 were recruited through the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry. The primary endpoint was FTR, defined as the proportion of patients with 30-day mortality after severe postoperative complications in colorectal cancer surgery. Severe postoperative complications were defined as Clavien–Dindo ≥ 3. FTR incidence rate ratios (IRR) were calculated comparing center volume stratified in low-volume (≤ 200 cases/year) and high-volume centers (> 200 cases/year), as well as with an alternative stratification comparing low-volume (< 50 cases/year), medium-volume (50–150 cases/year) and high-volume centers (> 150 cases/year).ResultsA total of 23,351 patients were included in this study, of whom 2964 suffered severe postoperative complication(s). Adjusted IRR showed no significant differences between high- and low-volume centers with an IRR of 0.97 (0.75–1.26, p = 0.844) in high-volume centers in the first stratification and an IRR of 2.06 (0.80–5.31, p = 0.134) for high-volume centers and 2.15 (0.83–5.56, p = 0.116) for medium-volume centers in the second stratification.ConclusionThis nationwide retrospectively analyzed cohort study fails to demonstrate a significant association between hospital surgical volume and FTR after colorectal cancer surgery. Future studies should explore alternative characteristics and their correlation with FTR to identify possible interventions for the improvement of quality of care after colorectal cancer surgery.

Highlights

  • The association between postoperative outcomes after cancer surgery and center volumes has been the topic of much debate, and the assumption that centers with higher caseload perform advanced operations with improved outcomes has driven centralization [1]

  • The aim of the current study is to evaluate FTR following colorectal cancer surgery between clinics based on procedure volume

  • This nationwide retrospectively analyzed cohort study fails to demonstrate a significant association between hospital surgical volume and FTR after colorectal cancer surgery

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The association between postoperative outcomes after cancer surgery and center volumes has been the topic of much debate, and the assumption that centers with higher caseload perform advanced operations with improved outcomes has driven centralization [1]. Failure-to-rescue (FTR), an emerging surgical outcome metric reflecting center-level quality of postoperative care, is described as ‘‘the mortality rate among patients with complications’’[12]. Literature on center volume and its effect on FTR after colorectal cancer surgery is scarce. The relationship between hospital surgical volume and outcome after colorectal cancer surgery has thoroughly been studied. Few studies have assessed hospital surgical volume and failure-to-rescue (FTR) after colon and rectal cancer surgery. The aim of the current study is to evaluate FTR following colorectal cancer surgery between clinics based on procedure volume

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call